Thursday, April 22, 2021

The Logic of Giving (Jn 6:1-15)*

The Logic of Giving
Reflection on John 6:1-15
Pope Francis



In this Sunday’s Gospel, we witness the profound sign of the multiplication of the loaves as recounted by John the Evangelist (6:1-15). Jesus, standing on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, is surrounded by a multitude attracted by the miracles He had performed, healing those afflicted with various ailments (v. 2). At this moment, Jesus reveals not only His role as healer but also as a teacher. He climbs a hill, assuming the traditional position of a teacher as He prepares to impart wisdom.


Understanding fully what is about to happen, Jesus puts His disciples to the test. Faced with thousands of hungry people, He asks how they might feed them all. Philip quickly calculates the impossibility of the situation in material terms: even with a collection of 200 denarii, there would not be enough to feed such a large crowd. Here, the disciples are thinking in terms of the logic of “buying,” of scarcity. But Jesus introduces a new logic—the logic of giving.


Andrew, another disciple, brings forward a boy who offers five loaves and two fish, though he admits they are insufficient for the multitude (cf. v. 9). But this small offering is precisely what Jesus was waiting for. He takes the loaves and fish, gives thanks to the Father, and distributes them to the crowd (v. 11). In this moment, Jesus prefigures the Last Supper, where He will offer Himself as the true Bread of Life. The bread of God is Jesus Himself. When we receive Him in Communion, we receive His life within us, and we become children of God, united as brothers and sisters.


To partake in the Eucharist is to enter into the logic of Jesus—the logic of giving and sharing. Regardless of how little we think we have, we all possess something to give. Receiving Communion is an invitation to draw from Christ the grace that enables us to share ourselves and our gifts with others.


The crowd was amazed by the miracle, but the real gift Jesus offers is much more profound: it is the fullness of life that satisfies not just physical hunger, but the hunger for meaning, for God. In the face of suffering, poverty, and loneliness in the world, we may feel helpless. But like the boy in the Gospel, we can offer whatever small talents, time, or resources we have—our own “five loaves and two fish.” Placed in the hands of Jesus, even the smallest of our efforts can multiply to bring love, peace, and joy to the world.


This reflection reminds us that joy is essential in our lives, and God can multiply even our smallest acts of kindness. Let us pray that no one may lack the Bread of Life or the basic necessities of a dignified existence, and that the logic of sharing and love may grow ever stronger.


Source: Pope Francis, Angelus, St. Peter's Square, 26 July 2015
Photo by: Quinnie Ann Balderas Fernandez

Thursday, April 8, 2021

The Four Dominican Popes*

THE FOUR DOMINICAN POPES

Source: McBrien, Richard, Lives of the Popes: The Pontiffs from St Peter to Benedict XVI, Harper Collins Publishers: NY, 2000.



BLESSED POPE INNOCENT V (ca.1224-1276)
Pope from January 21 to June 22, 1276


A renowned French theologian, Dominican Provincial of France, Archbishop of Lyons and Cardinal-Bishop of Ostia, Pierre de Tarentaise adopted the name ‘Innocent’ when he reigned as the first Dominican Pope on 21 January 1276. Moreover, the current papal custom of wearing a white cassock may have begun with him when he decided to continue wearing his white Dominican habit as pope. Others suggest that the custom was not finally established until the pontificate of another Dominican, Pope Pius V (1566-1572).

In 1274, Innocent V participated in the Second Council of Lyon, and also preached at the funeral of his friend St. Bonaventure. He tried to unify the European powers in order to fulfill the plan of Gregory X, his predecessor, for a new crusade. In order to move away from his predecessor’s cultivation of the Germans, he engaged in the political arena as he favored Charles, King of Sicily to the detriment of Rudolf, King of Germany. Furthermore, he struggled in his relationship with the East because he almost apologized to the Byzantine emperor for Charles’ plan of recapturing Constantinople on the grounds that it had been forcibly taken away from the Latins, and he demanded that the Greek clergy should take personal oaths accepting the ‘filioque’ in the Creed and the primacy of the pope. But death intervened and he died on June 22, only five months after his election. He was buried in the Basilica of St. John Lateran, and was beatified by Pope Leo XIII in 1898 on account of his reputation for holiness. Feast day: June 22.


BLESSED POPE BENEDICT XI (1240-1304)
Pope from October 22, 1303 to July 7, 1304


Born Niccolo Boccasini of an ordinary working-class family, he was the cardinal-bishop of Ostia and a Dominican when unanimously elected pope on 22 October 1303. He actually served as the 9th Master of the Order from 1296-1298. In support of the powerful but tragic reign of Boniface VIII, he chose the baptismal name of his predecessor as his regnal name, Benedict.

Benedict XI has been described by historians as a scholarly, but weak man who felt at ease only with his fellow Dominicans. He created only three cardinals during his reign, all Dominicans. He revoked the decree restricting the rights of mendicants (Dominicans and Franciscans) to preach and to hear confessions. A man of peace, he immediately lifted Boniface VIII’s excommunication. However, his pontificate was marked by his weak acquiescence to the demand of the King of France, Philip the Fair, who subjugated Boniface VIII.

On 7 July 1304, the pope died of acute dysentery in Perugia. In accordance with his wishes, he was buried in the Church of San Domenico in Perugia, where there were later reports of miraculous cures at his tomb. He was beatified by Pope Clement XII in 1736. Feast day: July 7.


SAINT POPE PIUS V (1504-1572)
Pope from January 7, 1566 to May 1, 1572


Born Antonio Ghislieri of poor parents, he was a shepherd until he became a Dominican at age 14, taking ‘Michele’ as his religious name. After his priestly ordination (1528), he served as an inquisitor for Como and Bergamo, and was appointed to the Roman Inquisition (1551). He became the bishop of Nepi and Sutri (1556), a cardinal (1557), and the grand inquisitor of Rome (1558). Then, he was the elected pope on 7 January 1566.

Pius V enforced the decrees of the Council of Trent, publishing the ‘Roman Catechism’ (1566) and reforming the Roman Missal and Breviary (1570) for unanimity in the liturgical celebrations. He restricted the use of indulgences and dispensation. He enforced a strict conduct of lifestyle not only on himself, but to the citizens of Rome who accused him of imposing monasticism to everyone. He continued to follow a monastic regimen for himself including the practice of simple, solitary meals, which remained a papal custom until the mid-20th century. He continued to wear his white Dominican habit which became the standard garb for the next popes. He opposed nepotism, insisted that clerics must reside in their pastoral assignments, and maintained a careful watch over the religious orders. He visited the Roman Basilicas and sent apostolic visitors to the Papal States and Naples. He endeavored to stamp out heresies, and he expelled the Jews from the Papal States but allowing some to remain in Rome and Ancona for commercial reasons. He declared Thomas Aquinas a ‘Doctor of the Church’ (1570) sponsoring the publication of his works in 17 volumes.

He engaged in the political sphere when he excommunicated Queen Elizabeth I of England exposing the English Catholics to persecution; gave financial and military assistance to Catherine de Medici against the Huguenots (French Calvinists), only to see her grant freedom of religion to them in 1570; angered Emperor Maximillian II when the pope presumed to nominate a new grand duke of Tuscany; and was in constant conflict with King Philip II of Spain on the royal control over the Church. Nevertheless, Pius V’s significant achievement in the political-military front was the victory of his Holy League with Spain and Venice over the Turkish fleet at Lepanto on 7 October 1571, which ended the Turkish superiority of the Mediterranean. He attributed this success to the Blessed Virgin Mary. He declared October 7 as the feast of Our Lady of Victory, which was changed by his successor Gregory XIII to the feast of the Most Holy Rosary.

Pius V died on 1 May 1572 at age 68 and was buried first in St. Peter’s, before his remains were transferred to the Basilica of St Mary Major in 1588. He was beatified on 1 May 1672 by Clement X and was canonized on 22 May 1712 by Clement XI. Feast day: April 30.


POPE BENEDICT XIII (1649-1730)
Pope from May 29, 1724 to February 21, 1730


Born Pietro Francesco Orsini, he renounced his inheritance and joined the Dominicans. Against his will, but through the influence of his family, he was created a cardinal in 1672 at age 23. Although he continued to live the life of a friar, he eventually became an archbishop. Then, he was unanimously elected pope on 29 May 1724 at age 75. He refused the papacy but later accepted it only when the Master of the Order urged him. He was caught in a controversy with his decision to retain Benevento as his Episcopal See while serving as the pope, the Bishop of Rome, which made him profoundly unpopular with the Roman people because of his cronies.

Despite the controversy, Benedict XIII manifested his service with pastoral sincerity. He consecrated churches, visited the sick, administered the sacraments, and even gave religious instructions. He criticized the lifestyle and fastidious appearance of cardinals and banned the profitable lottery in the Papal States. He presided over the Lateran Provincial Synod (1725) denouncing Jansenism. He declared that the teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas had nothing to do with the Jansenist error of exaggerating the effects of divine grace to the detriment of the human will, or with Quietism, the view that salvation will be given to those who await it 'quietly' and passively, with no human effort at all. He canonized many saints, including Sts. John of the Cross and Aloysius Gonzaga.

He passed away on 21 February 1730 at age 81. He was first buried in St. Peters, but his remains were transferred to the Basilica of Santa Maria sopra Minerva in 1738.


Friday, April 2, 2021

'Shoot me instead': Myanmar Nun Pleads with Junta Forces*

This handout photo taken on March 8, 2021 and released on March 9 by the Myitkyina News Journal shows a nun pleading with police not to harm protesters in Myitkyina in Myanmar's Kachin state, amid a crackdown on demonstrations against the military coup. (Photo by Handout / Myitkyina News Journal / AFP)

Source: New Straits Times
https://bit.ly/31GTRPI


Kneeling in the dust of a northern Myanmar city, Sr. Ann Rose Nu Tawng implored a group of heavily armed police officers to spare "the children" and take her life instead. The poignant image of the Catholic nun in her simple white habit, hands outstretched in a plea to the forces of the military junta, has gone viral, earning her widespread praise in the predominantly Buddhist nation.


"I knelt down... begging them not to shoot and torture the children, but to shoot me and kill me instead," she recounted. Her act of courage in Myitkyina on 9 March 2021, unfolded amidst the turmoil following the military's February 1, 2021 ousting of civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi. As protests demanding a return to democracy continued, the junta intensified its use of force, deploying tear gas, water cannons, rubber bullets, and live ammunition. Protesters in Myitkyina, the capital of Kachin state, donned hard hats and wielded makeshift shields.

When police began to encircle the demonstrators, Sr. Ann Rose Nu Tawng and two other nuns urged them to disperse. "The police were chasing to arrest them, and I was worried for the children," she said, prompting the 45-year-old nun to fall to her knees in desperation. As she begged for restraint, the police opened fire on the crowd behind her. "The children panicked and ran to the front... I couldn't do anything but pray for God to save and help the children," she recalled.


In a haunting moment, she witnessed a man shot in the head fall lifeless before her, followed by the searing sting of tear gas. "I felt like the world was crashing," she lamented. "I'm very sad it happened while I was begging them." Local rescue teams confirmed that two men were shot dead at the scene, although it remained unclear whether live rounds or rubber bullets were used. One of the deceased, Zin Min Htet, was placed in a glass casket and transported on a golden hearse adorned with white and red flowers. Mourners raised three fingers in a symbol of resistance, while a musical ensemble of brass players, drummers, and a bagpiper in crisp white uniforms led the funeral procession.


Kachin, Myanmar's northernmost state, is home to the Kachin ethnic group and has been embroiled in a long-standing conflict between ethnic armed groups and the military. Tens of thousands have been displaced, seeking refuge in camps across the state, with Christian organizations among those providing aid. This was not Sr. Ann Rose Nu Tawng's first encounter with security forces. On February 28, 2021, she had made a similar plea for mercy, approaching riot-equipped police, kneeling, and imploring them to cease their actions. "I have thought myself dead already since February 28," she reflected, recalling her decision to confront the armed officers. Joined by fellow sisters and the local bishop, they surrounded her as she pleaded for the safety of the protesters. "We were there to protect our sister and our people because she had her life at risk," Sr. Mary John Paul explained. The city has witnessed frequent crackdowns since the coup, including a violent dispersal of peaceful teachers that forced many into hiding.


According to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, more than 60 people have been killed in anti-coup demonstrations across the country. Despite the pervasive fear, Sr. Ann Rose Nu Tawng remains resolute. "I can't stand by and do nothing while witnessing the suffering around me and seeing all of Myanmar grieving," she declared, emphasizing her commitment to stand up for "the children."



Why Was the Temple Veil Torn at Christ's Death?*



The imagery of the veil in the ancient Jewish temple serves as a powerful symbol of the separation between humanity and God due to sin. The veil was not merely a physical barrier; it represented the profound spiritual divide that existed because of humanity's transgressions. In the innermost sanctum, known as the "Holy of Holies," rested the very presence of God, a place so sacred that access was restricted. Only the high priest could enter this holy space, and he did so only once a year on the Day of Atonement, bringing with him the blood of a sacrificial animal as an offering for the sins of the people. This act was a solemn reminder of the weight of sin and the necessity of atonement.


For generations, this practice continued, but it was never sufficient to fully reconcile humanity with God. Each sacrifice, while important, pointed to an inherent inadequacy; the blood of animals could not truly atone for the depth of human sinfulness. This cycle of sacrifice illustrated a longing for something greater—a perfect and final solution to the problem of sin.


The narrative shifts dramatically with the coming of Jesus Christ. More than 2000 years ago, He offered Himself as the perfect sacrifice, one that would fulfill the requirements of atonement once and for all. By laying down His life, Jesus bridged the chasm between God and humanity, paying the ultimate price for our sins. His sacrifice was not merely a continuation of the old covenant but a complete fulfillment of it.


The moment of Jesus’ death is marked by a profound event: the tearing of the veil in the temple from top to bottom. This act was symbolic of the removal of barriers that had long existed between God and His people. No longer would humanity be confined by the limitations of the law or the insufficiency of animal sacrifices. With the veil torn, direct access to God was made available to all who believe.


This transformation is encapsulated in the words of Jesus in John 5:24: “Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes Him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life.” This promise underscores the significance of faith in Christ as the means by which individuals can experience eternal life and communion with God, free from the judgment that sin brings. The sacrifice of Jesus not only secured redemption but also opened the way for a personal relationship with God, inviting all people to step into the fullness of His grace and mercy.


In essence, the tearing of the veil marks a new era in the relationship between God and humanity, one characterized by grace, accessibility, and the assurance of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. This profound shift invites all to respond, to believe, and to enter into the presence of God, knowing that they have been reconciled through the perfect sacrifice of the Lamb of God.

Saturday, March 27, 2021

Unitarianism and the Trinitarian Disputes of the First Century*


The capital doctrine of Christianity is the belief in One God in Three Persons, A Triune God: Father, Son (Logos), and Holy Spirit. 

The oldest patristic writings do not speak clearly of the relation of the three persons, especially of the Son to the Father. It was believed that the Redeemer is God and Son of God, but they had never studied His nature and the essence of His relationship with God the Father. Theological reflection started only when in the second century the heresies of the Judaizers and Gnostics put in danger the Christian doctrine. 


How can the divinity of the Son be reconciled with the Unity of God? From its origin, this double point of the Trinitarian dogma was accepted as general doctrine and belief of the Church, that is: 

a) That there is only one God – as the Jews professed too; 

b) That the Father, the Creator – the Son, Redeemer – and the Holy Spirit, Sanctifier – must be loved and adored as three divine individualities; that distinguishes the Christian faith from the Jewish religion. 

The problem then was to solve this which seemed to be contradictory. The heretics of the first three centuries in their attempt to defend the monotheistic idea exaggerated the divine unity to the point of suppressing the Trinity of persons. So some of them defended that the Redeemer, although born supernaturally from the Virgin Mary by the work of the Holy Spirit, was a simple man, whom the power of God (dynamis) had invested with an exceptional intensity. Others saw in Him the Father, attributing to the same and only person different ways of revealing Himself. Naturally, either the divinity of the Son or the personal distinction between the Father and the Son was sacrificed. This, again, is the Judeo-Christian line of thought. 

The followers of this heresy took the name of Monarchians, from their characteristic formula “Monarchiam tenemus”.[1] And they are divided into two groups: Dynamic or Ebionites and Modalists or Patripassians, according to the way of solving the problem. The fight against them was mainly carried out by Rome. 

Dynamic Monarchianism or Adoptionism 
According to all probability, the founder of Dynamic Monarchianism was Theodotus or Theodorus, a tanner from Byzantium, a man of more than ordinary knowledge. He spread his doctrine in Rome, where he was excluded from the community by Pope Victor (189-198), about 198; his disciples continued their propaganda in Rome. This school of thought held that Christ was a pure man, especially chosen by God, who filled Him with His spirit in Baptism. Christ was adopted as Son at his baptism, hence Adoptionism. 

But after the middle of the third century, the most conspicuous follower was the illustrious Paul of Samosata. In the synodal decision which condemned him,[2] he is described as an avaricious and worldly man, who cared more for his high position as viceroy of Queen Zenobia of Palmyra than for his bishopric. 

He defended a rigid unity of the nature and person of God and saw in Christ Jesus only a pure man, born of the Virgin Mary, in whom had lived, “as in a temple”, the impersonal logos, that is, the wisdom of God, which in a more reduced measure, had operated in Moses and the other prophets. For Paul of Samosata, the union of the Redeemer with God is not a union of nature, but a union of will. He was twice condemned by the bishops, 264 and 268, convicted of heresy and excommunicated, and finally expelled from his see. But this happened only in 272, when Aurelian defeated Queen Zenobia and conquered Antioch. Domnus was chosen to succeed Paul as bishop of Antioch. 

Probably one of his disciples was the famous Lucian of Antioch, founder of the Biblical School of Antioch. He spoke of the Logos in a Subordinationistic sense, based on scriptural texts, and as a follower of Paul of Samosata, he was, for some time, excluded from the orthodox community of Antioch.[3] It seems that during the persecution of Diocletian he was again reconciled. He died a martyr in 312. We must note, however, that we do not have clear information about him. There are some scholars (Loofs, Bardy, and others) who see in the excommunicated Lucian, follower and successor of Paul of Samosata, a different person from the exegete and martyr Lucian. From this school, there came out many bishops and the heretic Arius. 

Modal Monarchianism or Sabellianism 
The first exponent of Modalist Monarchianism was Noetus of Smyrna, very likely the bishop from a provincial city of Asia Minor. In 190 he was condemned in a synod of Smyrna. 

After his excommunication, Noetus came to Rome with one of his disciples Epigonus, somewhere between 198 and 210. If we are to believe Hippolytus (170-235), he was received sympathetically by the Bishop of Rome, Victor I (189-198), and especially by Zephyrinus (199-217). A party was formed in Rome under Cleomenes and Sabellius and great discussion beset the Roman Church. 

Tertullian attributes this doctrine to Praxeas, who was the first to bring this theory to Rome and then passed to Carthage where, if we are to follow Tertullian (Adversus Praxeam) he routed Praxeas, and better still, converted him. But this seems to be a mistake because Praxeas had suffered for the faith and seems to belong to a group violently opposed to Montanism; hence, the enmity of the Montanist Tertullian. 

The principal adversary of the Modalists or Sabellians was the learned and pugnacious Roman presbyter Hippolytus [4] who sometimes spoke in a subordinationistic way of the Logos.[5] He now attacked Sabellius as he had attacked Theodotus and when Pope Zephyrinus refused to endorse the letter of his attacks and to make his own the learned theories of Hippolytus, he turned to attack the Pope. Zephyrinus however, contented himself with a steady re-affirmation of what had always been believed: 

I only know one God who suffered and died, Jesus Christ, and beyond Him no other. It is not the Father who died but the Son.[6]

The fight still continued when the “power behind the throne”, the deacon Callistus, became Pope (217-222). Because of the election of his opponent, Hippolytus seceded and set up his sect as the true Church in opposition to the “Monarchist” Callistus. Meanwhile, Callistus had acted. He condemned Sabellius and excommunicated him as an innovator in the traditional belief, but he did not, in so doing, make his own subtle reasoning, by which Hippolytus exposed the heresy. 

The schism, however, still continued after the death of Callistus (222) and of his successor Urban I (222-230) although Hippolytus was never thrown out of the Church, but left it himself. During the persecution of Maximinus Thrax (235-238), directed against the heads of the Church, Pope Pontianus (230-235) and his adversary Hippolytus, reconciled. Hippolytus died a martyr. He is honored as a saint and martyr by the Church. 

The Modalists or Patripassians, so-called because they believed the Son was a manifestation, a modus of the Father and it was really the Father who was crucified in Calvary – still continued to exist, especially in Asia Minor and Egypt. 

The above-mentioned Sabellius, the head of the sect, who came from Libya, admitted three relations of God as Father in creation and legislation, as Son in Redemption, and as Holy Spirit in the work of sanctification. He deceived many people because he used the word “prosopon” (prosopon – theatrical masks, in Latin – persona) to show those different modes of God’s manifestation. 

The heresy was named after him and its effects were felt for a long time. From the end of the third century, Sabellianism is the name to designate, in the East, Modalist Monarchianism. 

Excursus: Rome’s Position in these Disputes 
A remarkable fact is apparent at the end of our consideration of these various groups: the presence at Rome of the representatives of all the different opinions. Marcion came to Rome; Valentine was there at the same period; Marcelianus spread the doctrine of Carpocrates (a Gnostic of Alexandria, whose son Epiphanes taught the common property of goods and women) under Pope Anicetus (c. 154-166) Justin, the martyr-philosopher founded his school at Rome, having the Assyrian Tatian as his disciple. Hegesippus the historian came to Rome about 160. Praxeas, Epigonus, and Theodotus went there. At the end of the second century, we have a swarm of schools at Rome: Justin’s disciples, Marcionites, Valentinians, Montanists, Adoptionists, Monarchianists, etc. The majority of these teachers came from Asia, but their battlefield was Rome. 

We may note that nearly all these men were foreigners. They came from Asia, Syria, Egypt, and Mesopotamia. That was the reflection, at the ecclesiastical level, of Rome’s extraordinary influence under the Antonines. The city had changed since Augustus (31 BC – 14 AD) and Nero (54-68): it was now a great cosmopolitan center where all races and religions met. Greek was spoken there as much as Latin. True, they already had close links with leading Roman families. They buried their dead in estates belonging to the Caecilii and Aurelii, but most of them were Easterners. Rome was the center where Asiatics and Syrians of all opinions spoke openly. This important role which Rome played in the life of the Church marks the end of the second century. It was linked to the city’s influence as a civilizing force, but it also bears witness to the eminent position of the see of Rome in the whole body of Christianity.[7]



[1]  Tertullian, Adv. Praxeam, 3.
[2]  Eusebius, H.E., VII, 30
[3]  Theodoret, H.E., I,3
[4]  Contra haeresim Noeti; Philosophoumena IX, 7-10; X,27
[5]  Phil, IX, 12; X,33
[6]  cf. Philip Hughes, A History of the Church, I, 102
[7]  cf. Danielou-Marrou, The Christian Centuries, A New History of the Church, vol I: The First Six Hudnred Years, p. 107-108


Saturday, March 20, 2021

Two Pearls: The Devotion to Bl. Margaret of Castello in the Philippines*



“For my father and my mother have left me but the Lord has taken me up” (Ps 26:10). 

Image of Bl. Margaret of Castello in Santo Domingo Church in Quezon City, PH

How can an unwanted person of the late 13th century be able to inspire Filipinos of the 21st century? How can a person whose locus nativitatis is almost 6,600 miles away—basically the other side of the world—reach as far as Asia in the Philippines to become her locus devotionis? Indeed, God moves in mysterious ways "’for [His] thoughts are not [our] thoughts, neither [our] ways [His] ways,’ declares the Lord" (Is 55:-8-9). The encounter between Bl. Margaret of Castello (ca. 1287-1320) and the Filipino people could be ages apart but the devotion was only formally promoted by Filipino Dominicans in 1987. The origin of Bl. Margaret in Italy and her cultus in the Philippines could be miles apart but the devotion persists since then, and becomes more vibrant today. Such encounter is ages apart, miles apart, worlds apart, but it endures the vicissitude of time and space. 

Since the 1980s, the Acta Capituli Provincialis of the Dominican Province of the Philippines stipulates a specific person who is tasked to promote the devotion to Bl. Margaret of Castello. The devotion is evident in the liturgical life of the Province. Beginning in the Novitiate, the study of the Vitae Fratrum Ordinis Prædicatorum has been an essential part of the initial formation of the Dominicans: “Another essential resource for us is the example, the teaching, and the prayers of the saints [and beati] of the Order of Preachers” (RFG, 27). The life and ministry of Bl. Margaret has been a part of the study and spiritual readings of the brothers. 

In the Central Seminary (CS) of the University of Santo Tomás, Bukluran Kanlungan, one of the groupings in the CS, decided to take Bl. Margaret of Castello as their patroness at the start of Formation Year 2018-2019. A seminarian once said: “We see her as a refuge of the neglected, the abandoned, the sick which reflects the values that we would like to imitate in our Bukluran (kanlungan means ‘refuge’).” Every evening, after the Angelus (or Regina Caeli), the seminarians pray the ‘Prayer for the Canonization of Bl. Margaret of Castello’ before her small image. Every year a Mass in honor of their patroness is celebrated by the entire Seminary community. 

The Dominican Laity in the Philippines holds dear the devotion to the saints and blessed of the Order as one of the chief sources from which they draw strength to advance in their proper vocation (cf. Rule, II §10). Two chapters of the Dominican Laity were placed under the patronage of Bl. Margaret. Likewise, the Priestly Fraternity of St. Dominic promotes the devotion towards all the saints and blessed of the Order, as well as the imitation of their example as stipulated in their rule. Therefore, the study of the life and ministry of Bl. Margaret and devotion to her could be a source of their sanctification especially that the Lives of Dominican Saints is part of the recommendations for the topics for their continuing program of formation. 

The Novena Prayer in honor of Bl. Margaret of Castello is prayed devotedly every Thursday at 5:30 pm at the Santo Domingo Church in Quezon City followed by the Eucharistic celebration. The processional images of Bl. Margaret are used in different parts of the Philippines especially in Quezon City, Manila, Marikina, and Pampanga. The copperplate engraving of Beata Margarita de Castelo by Carlos Borromeo in Fr. Francisco Gainza OP’s Milicia de Jesucristo: Manual de los Hermanos y Hermanas de la Tercero Orden de la Penitencia de Santo Domingo, published in Manila in 1859, is believed to be her earliest depiction the Philippines. Furthermore, Bl. Margaret has been popularly depicted during the ‘March of Saints’ on November 1, when children and adults are dressed as saints. 
Copperplate Engraving of Bl. Margaret of Castello


A number of organizations and institutions have been placed under her tutelage: Pro-Life Philippines, Bl. Margaret of Castello Movement, Bl. Margaret of Castello School, Bl. Margaret of Castello PWD Ministry in Santísimo Rosario Parish-UST, and the Bl. Margaret of Castello Chapel in Tahanang Walang Hagdanan. 

Abandoned and neglected, Margaret was the Hidden Pearl who ministered to the abandoned and neglected. Challenged by the times, the Philippines is dubbed as the Pearl of the Orient whose resiliency allows herself to rise above the challenges. The encounter between the two pearls is an attestation of the devotion to Bl. Margaret of Castello in the Philippines. 

Sunday, March 7, 2021

Pope Francis’ Homily during Mass for the 500th Anniversary of the Evangelization of the Philippines*

Pope Francis’ Homily during Mass for the 500th Anniversary of the Evangelization of the Philippines

Here is the full text of Pope Francis’ homily during Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica for the 500th anniversary of the arrival of Christianity in the Philippines on March 14, 2021:

Pope Francis at Mass with the Philippine community on Sunday, March 14. VATICAN MEDIA

“God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten Son” (Jn 3:16). This is the heart of the Gospel; this is the source of our joy. The Gospel message is not an idea or a doctrine. It is Jesus himself: the Son whom the Father has given us so that we might have life. The source of our joy is not some lovely theory about how to find happiness, but the actual experience of being accompanied and loved throughout the journey of life. “God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten Son”. Brothers and sisters, let us dwell on these two thoughts for a moment: “God so loved” and “God gave”.

First of all, God so loved. Jesus’ words to Nicodemus – a Jewish elder who wanted to know the Master – help us to see the true face of God. He has always looked at us with love, and for the sake of love, he came among us in the flesh of his Son. In Jesus, he went in search of us when we were lost. In Jesus, he came to raise us up when we fell. In Jesus, he wept with us and healed our wounds. In Jesus, he blessed our life forever. The Gospel tells us that whoever believes in him will not perish (ibid.). In Jesus, God spoke the definitive word about our life: you are not lost, you are loved. Loved forever.

If hearing the Gospel and practicing our faith don’t enlarge our hearts and make us grasp the immensity of God’s love – maybe because we prefer a glum, sorrowful and self-absorbed religiosity – then this is a sign that we need to stop and listen once more to the preaching of the Good News. God loves you so much that he gave you his entire life. He is not a god who looks down upon us from on high, indifferent, but a loving Father who becomes part of our history. He is not a god who takes pleasure in the death of sinners, but a Father concerned that no one be lost. He is not a God who condemns, but a Father who saves us with the comforting embrace of his love.

We now come to the second aspect: God “gave” his Son. Precisely because he loves us so much, God gives himself; he offers us his life. Those who love always go out of themselves. Don’t forget this: those who love to go out of themselves. Love always offers itself, gives itself, expends itself. That is the power of love: it shatters the shell of our selfishness, breaks out of our carefully constructed security zones, tears down walls and overcomes fears, so as to give freely of itself. That is what loves does: it gives itself. And that is how lovers are: they prefer to risk self-giving over self-preservation. That is why God comes to us: because he “so loved” us. His love is so great that he cannot fail to give himself to us. When the people were attacked by poisonous serpents in the desert, God told Moses to make the bronze serpent. In Jesus, however, exalted on the cross, he himself came to heal us of the venom of death; he became sin to save us from sin. God does not love us in words: he gives us his Son, so that whoever looks at him and believes in him will be saved (cf. Jn 3:14-15).

The more we love, the more we become capable of giving. That is also the key to understanding our life. It is wonderful to meet people who love one another and share their lives in love. We can say about them what we say about God: they so love each other that they give their lives. It is not only what we can make or earn that matters; in the end, it is the love we are able to give.

This is the source of joy! God so loved the world that he gave his Son. Here we see the meaning of the Church’s invitation this Sunday: “Rejoice… Rejoice and be glad, you who mourn: find contentment and consolation” (Entrance Antiphon; cf. Is 66:10-11). I think of what we saw a week ago in Iraq: a people who had suffered so much rejoiced and were glad, thanks to God and his merciful love.

Sometimes we look for joy where it is not to be found: in illusions that vanish, in dreams of glory, in the apparent security of material possessions, in the cult of our image, and in so many other things. But life teaches us that true joy comes from realizing that we are loved gratuitously, knowing that we are not alone, having someone who shares our dreams and who, when we experience shipwreck, is there to help us and lead us to a safe harbor.

Dear brothers and sisters, five hundred years have passed since the Christian message first arrived in the Philippines. You received the joy of the Gospel: the good news that God so loved us that he gave his Son for us. And this joy is evident in your people. We see it in your eyes, on your faces, in your songs and in your prayers. In the joy with which you bring your faith to other lands. I have often said that here in Rome Filipino women are “smugglers” of faith! Because wherever they go to work, they sow the faith. It is part of your genes, a blessed “infectiousness” that I urge you to preserve. Keeping bringing the faith, the good news you received five hundred years ago, to others. I want to thank you, then, for the joy you bring to the whole world and to our Christian communities. I think, as I mentioned, of the many beautiful experiences in families here in Rome – but also throughout the world – where your discreet and hardworking presence became a testimony of faith. In the footsteps of Mary and Joseph, for God loves to bring the joy of faith through humble, hidden, courageous and persevering service.

On this very important anniversary for God’s holy people in the Philippines, I also want to urge you to persevere in the work of evangelization – not proselytism, which is something else. The Christian proclamation that you have received needs constantly to be brought to others. The Gospel message of God’s closeness cries out to be expressed in love for our brothers and sisters. God desires that no one perish. For this reason, he asks the Church to care for those who are hurting and living on the fringes of life. God so loves us that he gives himself to us, and the Church has this same mission. The Church is called not to judge but to welcome; not to make demands, but to sow seeds; not to condemn, but to bring Christ who is our salvation.

I know that this is the pastoral program of your Church: a missionary commitment that involves everyone and reaches everyone. Never be discouraged as you walk this path. Never be afraid to proclaim the Gospel, to serve and to love. With your joy, you will help people to say of the Church too: “she so loved the world!” How beautiful and attractive is a Church that loves the world without judging, a Church that gives herself to the world. May it be so, dear brothers and sisters, in the Philippines and in every part of the earth.

Thursday, March 4, 2021

Book Review: Linking your Beads*


BOOK REVIEW
Kasten, Patricia Ann, Linking your Beads: The Rosary’s History, Mysteries and Prayers. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor, Inc., 2011, 123 pp.


The Holy Rosary is composed, principally and substantially, of the prayer of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Pater Noster (pp. 41-47) and the Angelic Salutation, the Ave Maria (pp. 48-53). It has been a principal devotion of the catholic faithful since time immemorial (pp. 7-10). Though many use it as a tangible aid for prayer and contemplation (pp. 14-18), or at least, are familiar with it; still, many are not knowledgeable about its historico-theological background. The aim of the book Linking your Beads: The Rosary’s History, Mysteries and Prayers is to provide its readers a whole new perspective on the power of prayer with the Rosary. As the title implies, the book endeavors to “link” not only the beads, but the Rosary itself to its readers in order to satisfy their curiosity, quench their thirst for knowledge, or even deepen their faith.

The author, Patricia Ann Kasten, is a Catholic journalist and author who currently serves as the associate editor of The Compass, the diocesan newspaper for Green Bay. Wisconsin, USA. Armed with a master’s degree in Theological Studies, she is the author of Scripture Search and crossword puzzles, found in diocesan newspapers and parish bulletins across the United States. She has been recognized numerous times by the Catholic Press Association. 

The book was given nihil obstat, an attestation by a church censor (Msgr. Michael Heintz) that this book contains nothing damaging to faith or morals; and imprimatur by Most Rev. Kevin Rhoades, Bishop of Fort Wayne-South Bend, the official approval to print or publish granted by ecclesiastical authority. It is written in contemporary parlance but is filled with authoritative notes. The twenty-three concise yet wide-ranging chapters cover the following topics: The history of the Rosary and its prayerful predecessors; the power of meditative prayer in various forms; the significant role of sacramentals in our walk of faith; the origins of each of the Rosary prayers including the Credo; the meaning and purpose of the Rosary’s many colors, styles and lengths among other interesting topics.

The author sets out on a venture to provide the historical background of the devotion at the beginning of the book. She links the rosary to the Desert Fathers who would recite each of the 150 psalms every day, tracking them through the use of beads on a string: “A string of beads kept count of the prayers, and the Rosary sprouted into existence” (p. 8). Also in the first chapter, entitled From the Desert to Dominicans, the author carefully stated that although “pious tradition says that [St.] Dominic received the Rosary from the Virgin Mary herself sometime between 1206 and 1214, the actual evidence of the full Rosary devotion being practiced only traces back to about the fifteenth century” (ibid.). Likewise, the author noted that various sources find “this lack of a direct connection between [St.] Dominic and the Rosary…” The 1985 Letter of the Master of the Order of Preachers by Fr. Damian Byrne, OP underscores such statement: “Whatever critical historians may have to say about the Legend of the Rosary, it bears witness to the charismatic gift entrusted by the Church to the Order of Preachers, a gift which we must exercise by reason of profession, by our legislation and by the constant exhortation of the See of Rome.”  Furthermore, the 1574 General Chapter of the Order of Preachers urged the Dominicans to preach the Rosary. Fr. Timothy Radcliffe, OP, in his 1998 Letter as Master of the Order of Preachers, said that the rosary “is ‘nostra sacra haereditas’, ‘our sacred inheritance’. There is a long tradition of pictures of Our Lady giving the Rosary to St. Dominic. But at one time, other religious orders… started commissioning paintings of Our Lady giving the Rosary to other saints, to St. Francis and even to St. Ignatius. But we... persuaded the Pope to ban the competition. Our Lady was only allowed to be shown giving the Rosary to Dominic!” But what the world owes St. Dominic and the Dominicans is not the Rosary as a prayer form, but as a devotion with lingering popularity and as an instrument of preaching the Catholic faith. The Legend, as such, is worth recalling in these days of renewed insistence on our preaching ministry: After much fruitless labor, tradition has it that the Mother of God appeared to Dominic in the forest of Bouconne near Toulouse --- "Wonder not that until now you have had such little fruit from your labors. You have spent them on a barren soil, not yet watered with the dew of divine grace. When God willed to renew the face of the earth He began by sending down the fertilizing dew of the Angelic Salutation. Preach my Rosary composed of one hundred and fifty Aves, and you will obtain an abundant harvest."

The rosary, as a form of prayer, was a product of centuries of evolution. The second chapter, The Pitter-Patter of Lady Godiva, presents the idea that the use of strings of beads to facilitate prayer and meditation is not exclusive to Christianity. Christianity shares the tradition of keeping track of the number of prayers uttered through prayer counters such as rocks, sticks, notches in wood, and even knots and beads with Hinduism, Buddhism, and even Islam. The title of this chapter is actually an endnote of the chapter when Lady Godiva was discussed as a representative of the laypeople in their Rosary devotion. 

The third chapter, The Power Tools of Contemplation, provides the meditative forms of prayer of two important figures of contemplation: the meditation of St. Anthony of Egypt and the silence of St. Joseph. The fourth chapter, The Rosary’s Older Cousin, discusses the Jesus Prayer --- ”Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner,” --- a simple profession of faith in Jesus Christ as the Son of God (p. 20). 

The fifth chapter, Sacramentals: the Lamplight and the Power Plant, discusses the Theology behind the sacramentals. Interestingly, the comparison between sacraments and sacramentals is discussed. However, the author vaguely states that: “Sacraments and sacramentals both involve grace, which makes things holy, but in different ways” (p. 24). In its fundamental definition, “a Sacrament is an outward sign instituted by Christ to give grace” (Baltimore Catechism, no. 3, lesson 13, q. 574) while “Sacramentals are sacred signs which in a sense imitate the sacraments. They signify certain effects, especially spiritual ones, and they achieve these effects through the intercession of the Church (CIC 1166). With due respect to the author’s simplistic style, she states that “sacramentals … impart the grace that flows from the sacrament they represent” (p. 25) but the Catechism of the Catholic Church directly states that: “Sacramentals do not confer grace (as sacraments do), but they prepare for grace and dispose us to cooperate. Sacraments and sacramentals draw their power from Christ's Resurrection” (CCC, 1670).

Chapter 6, The How, When and Wear of the Rosary, provides a step-by-step method on how and when to pray the Rosary including ways to wear it. The author then leads the reader through every piece of the rosary, from the sign of the cross (Chapter 7) at the beginning of the devotion, through the Apostle's Creed (Chapter 8), the Our Fathers (Chapter 9), the Hail Marys (Chapter 10), the Glory Bes (Chapter 11; also known as the ‘doxology’), the Salve Regina (Chapter 12), and finally, Amen (Chapter 13). She explains the background behind each of these prayers and why they are included in the rosary. 

However, a discussion on the Litany of Loreto is lacking. It is a Marian litany originally approved in 1587 by Pope Sixtus V and was first prayed at the Shrine of Our Lady of Loreto (Italy), where its usage was recorded as early as 1558. It may be used for private devotion but it is closely associated with the recitation of the Rosary. Nevertheless, the Marian title “Mystical Rose” (p. 114) is well-discussed in the final chapter. Furthermore, the Fatima prayers, the Prayer to St. Joseph, the Memorare and the Prayer to Saint Michael the Archangel are also discussed in chapter 20, “The Cherry on Top”.

Chapters 15 to 18 discuss the mysteries of the Holy Rosary. The author also quickly points out that the Rosary, as with all prayer, leads us to a devotion to Jesus and God's love; the Rosary does this through meditation on the life and ministry of our Lord Jesus Christ. Each one of these mysteries is well-explained, giving the reader something to meditate upon when "linking the beads". 

Chapter 19, entitled Pick a Number, Any Number… Any Color, too, discusses the different forms of the rosary: the Lasso Rosary, El Lazo, Auto Rosary, the Crown of our Lord, the Rosary for the Dead, the Chaplet of St. Bridget, the Servite Rosary, the Missionary Rosary and many other popular chaplets dealing with saints and angels. 

Chapter 21, Devotion  Stealing Worship from God?,  serves both as an apology against other religions who criticize the catholics’ Communion of; and catechism for practicing Catholics who are confused. The Theological terms latria, hyperdulia and dulia are well-discussed.

Chapter 22, Armed for Battle, presents the role of the Rosary in the 1571 Battle of Lepanto, the World Wars, and the Iraq Wars. A discussion on the so-called “ranger rosary” can be worth the inclusion in this chapter. Its mission is to put a rosary into the hands of every member of the Armed Services who wants one. Its all-volunteer ministry makes rosaries by hand and ships them to military chaplains around the world, along with prayer cards and scapulars. The organization ensures that every serviceman and woman has a rosary to pray on. This could be a great addendum. 

Chapter 23, Making Scents of Heaven, discusses the literal and figurative meaning of the rosarium, or garland of prayer flowers, an appropriate conclusion to reflect on the Rosary with flowers.

This book is recommended for all states of life: priests, religious and the laity. It serves as a good primer for further studies on the Rosary. It provides the fundamental knowledge on the Rosary that even a devotee might not know. The simplicity of presentation reflects what the Rosary is. Fr. Radcliffe, OP asked: “It may seem a little strange that a prayer as simple as the Rosary should be particularly associated with Dominicans. Dominicans are not often thought of as very simple people. We have a reputation for writing long and complex books on theology. But why is this simple prayer so dear to Dominicans? Perhaps, it is because at the center of our theological tradition is a longing for simplicity. St. Thomas Aquinas said that we cannot understand God because God is utterly simple --- simple beyond all our conceptions. We study, we wrestle with theological problems, we strain our minds, but the aim is to draw near to the mystery of the One who is totally simple. We have to pass through the complexity so as to arrive at simplicity.”








Powered by Blogger.